Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Shenzhen Kunshengze Elec-tronic Commerce Co., Ltd. v. THE PARTNERSHIPS and UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A"
as 1:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Kunshengze Elec-tronic Commerce Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIPS and UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A", B.DANDONG03, MOUSE DREAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED v. PPGAMESUSA.COM et al
as 1:2023cv01692
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Defendant:
PPGAMESUSA.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYGAMING.COM, ASIAPRAGMATICPLAY.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gerald J. Lofaro v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv15995
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Lofaro
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, SunFlower UK, VEGCOO Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jeff Bartels v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03757
Plaintiff:
Jeff Bartels
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ZhangPengYu, kabudaxiaobao and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Paddington & Company Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03652
Plaintiff:
Paddington & Company Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, wabl Store, 812919634 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
RooR International BV et al v. Smoke Shop XXX, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05468
Plaintiff:
SREAM, INC. and ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV
Defendant:
Ashfaque Khanani, Smoke Shop XXX, Inc. and Smoke Shop For You III, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
