Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Woody v. Western Correctional Institute et al
as 1:2024cv02693
Defendant:
Western Correctional Institute, Executive Director Inmate Grievance Office, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Kenneth Woody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamorrow v. Ascend Apollo, LLC
as 8:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Woodis Jamorrow
Defendant:
Ascend Apollo, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Woody v. Maryland Attorney General
as 1:2022cv02308
Petitioner:
Paul Willard Woody
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General
Defendant:
Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Woody v. Maryland Division Of Corrections
as 8:2020cv01896
Defendant:
Maryland Division Of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Paul W. Woody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Parker et al v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
Katherine Parker and Montrell T. Woody
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2401
JG Wentworth Originations, LLC v Woody et al
as 1:2012cv00403
Defendant:
Da'Juan Lamar Woody, Lavender Funding, LLC, Hugh D. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
JG Wentworth Originations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Woody v. Warden
as 8:2011cv03752
Plaintiff:
Todd Woody
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woody v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2008cv02490
Plaintiff:
Mary Woody
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Systel, Inc. of Delaware Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnston et al v. CBLPath, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00351
Plaintiff:
Brenda Johnston and Woody Johnston
Defendant:
CBLPath, Inc. and CBLPath, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
