Cases 1 - 10 of 21
McDaniel v. Forshey
as 5:2023cv01698
Petitioner:
Woody A. McDaniel
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Frost v. Fisher et al
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Richard Frost
Defendant:
Officer Courtland Fisher, Officer George Shevkin, Officer David Woodie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lawrence v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv04856
Plaintiff:
Woody Lawrence
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walden v. Northmont City School District Board of Education et al
as 3:2021cv00264
Defendant:
Karl Espeleta, Northmont City School District Board of Education, Tony Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Charles L Walden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bawidamann v. Northmont City School District, et al.
as 3:2021cv00255
Plaintiff:
E.B., a minor, K.B., a minor and Benjamin Bawidamann
Defendant:
Northmont City School District, Tony Thomas, Linda Blum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Woody v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02585
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randal Woody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woody v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01775
Plaintiff:
Sharee Woody
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc., Inc. Davol and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frost v. Fisher et al
as 2:2019cv05372
Defendant:
Officer David Woodie, Trustee Aryeh Alex, Franklin Township, Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Frost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donnenwirth v. Woody's Wing House, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04168
Plaintiff:
Maria Donnenwirth
Defendant:
Woody's Wing House, LLC, Scott Walker and Jiechun Liu
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
