Cases 1 - 10 of 24,902
Boyd v. County of Spartanburg
as 7:2024cv03139
Plaintiff:
Latasha Boyd and Latasha Monique Boyd
Defendant:
County of Spartanburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nance v. Reynolds et al
as 8:2024cv03142
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nance
Defendant:
Don Reynolds, Randall Sammons, Steven Wix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Young v. Wright et al.
as 9:2024cv03114
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Honorable Alan Wilson, Donald J Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 6:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toatley v. Myers et al
as 0:2024cv03134
Plaintiff:
James Toatley
Defendant:
SGT. Myers and SCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Johnson v. Lt. Chandler et al
as 0:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
David Tyran Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Chandler, Sgt. Calex, SCDC Security Threat Group Intelligence Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Velazquez v. USA
as 3:2024cv03056
Petitioner:
Alice Hortencia Velazquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Starnes v. Ward et al
as 6:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
Tracy Wright Starnes
Defendant:
Paul Ward, Seth Mills, Greenville County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dhimo v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv03039
Petitioner:
Alqi Dhimo
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Little v. McDaniel
as 0:2024cv03044
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr
Defendant:
Eric McDaniel and Florence County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
