Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 50,950
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00631
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Courtney v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00627
Petitioner: Antonio Courtney
Respondent: Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff: Larry Steele
Defendant: Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center, LLC and Dr. Serge Marinkovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Paul v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00623
Petitioner: Rico Paul
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00630
Petitioner: William Billy G. Carter
Respondent: Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moll v. Lamb et al
as 4:2024cv00624
Plaintiff: Michael Duane Moll
Defendant: Jason H. Lamb, Jeffrey A. Suddy, Jr. and Kathrine Griesbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00622
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00626
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00628
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Human v. EZ Insurance Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00625
Plaintiff: Daniel Human
Defendant: EZ Insurance Solutions, LLC and John and Jane Does 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?