Cases 1 - 10 of 28
BaoNgoc T. Vo v. Thomas M. Seibel et al
as 4:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
BaoNgoc T. Vo
Defendant:
C3.ai, Inc., Thomas M. Seibel, Patricia A. House and others
BaoNgoc T. Vo v. Thomas M. Seibel et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
BaoNgoc T. Vo
Defendant:
Thomas M. Seibel, Patricia A. House, Lisa A. Davis and others
Nominal Defendant:
C3.ai, Inc.
Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al v. Amory Investments LLC, et al
as 22-8007
Petitioner:
SANDERSON FARMS, INC., PERDUE FARMS, INCORPORATED, FOSTER FARMS, LLC and others
Respondent:
AMORY INVESTMENTS LLC, CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY, CAMPBELL SOUP SUPPLY COMPANY, L.L.C. and others
Suri v. Siebel et al
as 4:2022cv03031
Plaintiff:
Naren Suri
Defendant:
Thomas M. Siebel, Patricia A. House, Richard Levin and others
The Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01413
Plaintiff:
The Reckstin Family Trust, Dennis Martinez, Christie Sweeney and others
Defendant:
C3.ai, Inc., Thomas M. Siebel, David Barter and others
Petitioner:
Yining Cai, Leonard Janos, Fadi Karnaby and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
WHITFIELD v. QTS REALTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03609
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
QTS REALTY TRUST, INC., CHAD WILLIAMS, PHILIP P TRAHANAS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Reinhardt v. QTS Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03273
Plaintiff:
Charles Reinhardt
Defendant:
QTS Realty Trust, Inc., Chad L. Williams, John W. Barter and others
Lawrence v. QTS Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03272
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
QTS Realty Trust, Inc., Chad L. Williams, John W. Barter and others
Hardwick v. QTS Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06593
Plaintiff:
Fred Hardwick
Defendant:
QTS Realty Trust, Inc., Chad Williams, Philip P. Trahanas and others
Reisbick v. QTS Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06350
Plaintiff:
Spencer Reisbick
Defendant:
QTS Realty Trust, Inc., Chad Williams, Philip P. Trahanas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
