Cases 1 - 10 of 66
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2024cv01609
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
Julie Lynch, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, Frederick D Benton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abernathy v. City Of Cincinnati
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Paulette Abernathy
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati and Robin Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Calhoun v. F. Garza, Warden at FCI Elkton
as 4:2022cv01866
Petitioner:
David Calhoun
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hope v. Berg et al
as 5:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Valerie Hope
Defendant:
Angela Berg, Stephanie Bowens, Rebecca McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Boardman Township et al
as 4:2021cv00838
Defendant:
Boardman Township, Thomas Costello, Speedway and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Speedway, LLC
Plaintiff:
Dominique King
3Rd Party Defendant:
Off Duty Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01039
Plaintiff:
James Calhoun
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. DeWine et al
as 1:2020cv00434
Defendant:
Richard "Mike" DeWine, Amy Acton and Frank LaRose
Plaintiff:
Anita Rios, Dario Hunter, Joseph R. DeMare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2020cv02781
Plaintiff:
Anita Rios, Dario Hunter, Joseph R. DeMare and others
Defendant:
Michael "Mike" DeWine, Amy Acton and Frank LaRose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Calhoun v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Calhoun
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
