Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Chavez v. Arviza
as 1:2024cv00345
Petitioner:
Jorge Chavez
Respondent:
Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Chavez et al v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.
as 2:2023cv03697
Plaintiff:
Dina Chavez, Jose Benitez and Diego Trinidad Duran
Defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Chavez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Jesus Chavez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHAVEZ-GARNICA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01303
Plaintiff:
Aida Chavez-Garnica and Alessa Torres
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
CHAVEZ v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01456
Plaintiff:
LUZ ELENA CHAVEZ
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAVEZ-GARCIA, et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv04167
Plaintiff:
AIDA CHAVEZ-GARCIA
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CHAVEZ v. WARDEN, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 3:2020cv00240
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Petitioner:
Jorge Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chavez v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv02171
Plaintiff:
Jorge Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01651
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
