Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Senarathne v. United States Department of State et al
as 8:2022cv02512
Plaintiff:
Madhura Senarathne
Defendant:
United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy in Colombo, Sri Lanka, Antony Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Valenzuela v. Wasabi Bistro, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01296
Defendant:
Sonny Chung Sun Lee, Sr. and Wasabi Bistro, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Freddy Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tai et al v. The United States of America
as 8:2020cv03680
Plaintiff:
Katherine Tai, Kenneth C Tai and Chung-Yui Tai
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 2702
Snowden et al v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2020cv02913
Plaintiff:
Alfred Snowden and Judith Snowden
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, William M. Sivley, Robert M. Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Tarpley et al v. Chung
as 1:2019cv03288
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tarpley and Patricia Edwards Tarpley
Defendant:
Chung Ho Chung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chung v. Scholl
as 8:2019cv02702
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chung
Defendant:
Tom L. Scholl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chung v. Scholl
as 1:2019cv02702
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chung
Defendant:
Tom Scholl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chung et al v. Scholl et al
as 1:2019cv01746
Defendant:
keystone Coal Company and Tom Scholl
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chung and In yong chung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chung et al v. Scholl et al
as 8:2019cv01746
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chung and In Yong Chung
Defendant:
Tom L. Scholl and Keystone Coal Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
