Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJarnette v. Immigration Centers of America-Farmville, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00706
Plaintiff:
Rogers DeJarnette
Defendant:
Immigration Centers of America-Farmville, LLC and Mark A. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Poston v. Kane et al
as 1:2013cv00365
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Poston
Defendant:
Kane, Tracy Jones, Eric Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Immigration Centers of America - Farmville, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00895
Plaintiff:
The Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Defendant:
Immigration Centers of America - Farmville, LLC, Mark A. Flowers and Jeffrey D. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Directv, LLC v. Flowers et al
as 3:2012cv00862
Plaintiff:
Directv, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas Flowers, Sharon A. Flowers and Kayhill Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Violation of Federal Communications Act
Flowers v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00486
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Dee Flowers
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00399
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Guerra v. Lucero et al
as 1:2012cv00064
Petitioner:
Frederico Vega Guerra
Respondent:
Enrique Lucero, Mark Flowers, John Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
