Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Robles v. Veetoune Mokhantha et al
as 5:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Robles
Defendant:
Veetoune Mokhantha, Dusty Davis and Family Flower Co LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Flowers v. Bridges
as 5:2022cv00850
Petitioner:
David Earl Flowers
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens et al v. Flowers Foods Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Stacy D Owens and K&S Owens Distributing Inc
Defendant:
Flowers Foods Inc, Flowers Baking Company and Flowers Baking Co of Denton LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flowers v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2021cv00795
Plaintiff:
Andrea Flowers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Flowers v. Moore et al
as 5:2021cv00637
Defendant:
Haleigh Wood, Jeramy Lansdale, Wynnewood City of and others
Plaintiff:
Neal Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Watson et al
as 6:2021cv00171
Defendant:
Blake Lynch, Mike Hunter, Judicial Council Association and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dwayne Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gossett v. Flowers et al
as 6:2021cv00134
Respondent:
Don Helphinstine, Darren Rogers, Aaron Duck and others
Petitioner:
Jason Shantel Gossett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
