Cases 1 - 8 of 8
N. et al v. Gillette Childrens Specialty Healthcare Medical Benefit Plan
as 0:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
Shani N. and J. G.
Defendant:
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare Medical Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ross v. Gillette Children Hospital et al
as 0:2023cv02488
Plaintiff:
Albert Ross
Defendant:
Gillette Children Hospital and Ronald McDonald House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dotson v. Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
as 0:2022cv02046
Plaintiff:
Howard Dotson
Defendant:
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Children's Health Care v. Burwell et al
as 0:2016cv04064
Defendant:
Burwell, Thomas Price, Andrew Slavitt and others
Plaintiff:
Children's Health Care and Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Gillette et al v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv03005
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Gillette and Raif Szczepanski
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingleheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandy Lake Band of Mississippi Chippewa v. United States of America et al
as 0:2011cv02786
Plaintiff:
Sandy Lake Band of Mississippi Chippewa
Defendant:
United States of America, Ken Salazar, Larry Echo Hawk and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0461
Dematic Corp. v. Gillette
as 0:2008cv04830
Plaintiff:
Dematic Corp., Dematic Corp., Dematic Corp. and others
Defendant:
Scott Gillette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Malcolm et al v. M & C Furniture Installations, LLC et al
as 0:2007cv02677
Plaintiff:
Scott Malcolm, Tim McGough and Scott Malcolm
Defendant:
M & C Furniture Installations, LLC and Gillett Cole
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
