Cases 1 - 7 of 7
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Castelloe et al
as 5:2014ct03035
Plaintiff:
David Henry Miller
Defendant:
Superintendent Castelloe, Theresa Gillette, Mr. Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks et al v. Gemmy Industries Corp. et al
as 5:2011cv00652
Plaintiff:
William Hicks , Kelly Hicks and D. H.
Defendant:
Gemmy Industries Corp. , Duracell, Inc. , The Procter & Gamble Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evernham, Jr. v. Booth Creek Management Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00196
Defendant:
Booth Creek Management Corporation and Gillett GEMS LLC
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Evernham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
GILLETT v. EVEREST ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC
as 1:2010cv00292
Plaintiff:
JAMES GILLETT
Defendant:
EVEREST ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. et al v. Does et al
as 3:2009cv00046
Plaintiff:
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., Motorsports Authentics, LLC, Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and others
Defendant:
John & Jane Does and Various XYZ Corporations
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. et al v. Various John and Jane Does et al
as 3:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., Motorsports Authentics LLC, Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Various John and Jane Does, Various XYZ Corporations, Frank Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
