Cases 1 - 10 of 215
Mercado v. Coleman Murphy et al
as 1:2024cv10046
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mercado
Defendant:
Doris Coleman Murphy and Guy Harold Harris, 3rd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Loffelmacher v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11985
Plaintiff:
Harold Don Loffelmacher
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Progressive Insurance Company v. Explicit Wear Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10726
Plaintiff:
Progressive Insurance Company
Defendant:
Explicit Wear Inc., Harold Miller and Jakarrie Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Voltus, Inc. v. Harold
as 1:2023cv10662
Plaintiff:
Voltus, Inc.
Defendant:
Gregory Harold
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Jennifer C. Boal
Kirkland v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2022cv11981
Plaintiff:
Harold Kirkland
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Winters v. North Bridge Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv11528
Plaintiff:
Harold A. Winters
Defendant:
North Bridge Capital, Inc., Oyster River Capital LP and Richard A. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Luongo v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv12099
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Luongo and Ajmair Heer
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, James Haley and others
Petitioner:
Carl W. Lentz IV, Zeyu Liu, Mathew McInally and others
Saunders v. Picard et al
as 1:2021cv11240
Plaintiff:
Mark Saunders
Defendant:
Rosalind Picard, Ann McKay, Kristen Luken and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv30013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
