Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
as 15-1831
Plaintiff:
PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC, AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD. and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
CARL F. JENKINS
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Movant:
PAULA M. COUTURE, in her capacity as Trustee of the 5 Regent Circle Realty Trust
Intervenor:
BARTON BRUCE
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
as 15-1371
Plaintiff:
PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC, AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD. and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
CARL F. JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
BARTON BRUCE
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Movant:
PAULA M. COUTURE, in her capacity as Trustee of the 5 Regent Circle Realty Trust
Luster v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 14-2070
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
NATALIE LUSTER
Plaintiff:
TARA JOHNDROW, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRIAN ANSON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SCOTT A. WILCOX, on behalf of himself & all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FOREST LABORATORIES, INC., FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
as 14-1961
Plaintiff:
PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC, AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Movant - Appellant:
PAULA M. COUTURE, in her capacity as Trustee of the 5 Regent Circle Realty Trust
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Jaeckel, et al v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 14-8004
Plaintiff:
JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, ANNA MURRET, UNIVERSAL CARE, INC. and others
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ANGELA JAECKEL, MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Defendant - Petitioner:
FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Interested Party:
NATALIE LUSTER
Penn v. Knox County, et al
as 13-2385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHY PENN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADLEY WOLL, individually and in his official capacity as Knox County Corrections Officer, ANGELA ESCORSIO, individually and in her official capacity as Knox County Corrections Officer and DANE WINSLOW, individually and in his official capacity as Knox County Corrections Officer
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY, KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, KNOX COUNTY JAIL and others
Penn v. Knox County, et al
as 13-2309
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CATHY PENN
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY, KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, KNOX COUNTY JAIL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGELA ESCORSIO, individually and in her official capacity as Knox County Corrections Officer, DANE WINSLOW, individually and in his official capacity as Knox County Corrections Officer and BRADLEY WOLL, individually and in his official capacity as Knox County Corrections Officer
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Gangi
as 13-1271
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Plaintiff:
PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee:
QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee:
CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor:
JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
