Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NEWCOMB et al v. DECATUR COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2020cv03280
Plaintiff:
JACOB GROSSOM, ALLEN ASHER-BUTLER, DYLAN ROQUILLO and others
Defendant:
DECATUR COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. REID HOSPITAL (HEATH) et al
as 2:2020cv00523
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY JAIL, REID HOSPITAL (HEATH) and RICHMOND POLICE DEPT.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PAUL DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTHEFORD v. A. et al
as 1:2019cv03005
Defendant:
TAMERA SMITH, YVONNE A. and YOKO SAVINO
Plaintiff:
HEATH RUTHEFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. VANZEE et al
as 1:2017cv00467
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN, CONWAY, BARBARA CRAWFORD and others
Plaintiff:
TROY M. HEATH, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. OFFICER BURNS et al
as 3:2016cv00250
Defendant:
BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF BLOOMINGTON INDIANA, OFFICER BURNS and others
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
HEATH CARL FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAYLESS v. EWING et al
as 2:2016cv00306
Defendant:
CANTEEN SERVICES, GREG EWING and VIGO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Plaintiff:
DAVID HEATH GRAYLESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEDY v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2015cv00053
Defendant:
SAMUEL BEARD, DENISE BROOKS, SCOTT CONLEN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HEATH KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SELLECK v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2009cv01284
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEE SELLECK
Defendant:
MARK A. MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD, JIM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
