Cases 31 - 40 of 183
Graff, et al v. Aberdeen Enterprizes, II, et al
as 21-5031
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY DERRYBERRY, Sheriff of LeFlore County, ABERDEEN ENTERPRIZES, II, INC., ADAM WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Latimer County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRA LEE WILKINS, LINDA MEACHUM, DAVID SMITH and others
Defendant:
P.D. TAYLOR, Sheriff of Oklahoma County
Dejager et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2021cv00449
Plaintiff:
Heath Dejager and Heidi Dejager
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Moore v. Heath
as 2:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Moore
Defendant:
John C. Heath ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC doing business as Lexington Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Baron Partners v. Suisse Management et al
as 2:2020cv00746
Defendant:
Soljets, Suisse Management and Heath Family Aviation
Plaintiff:
Baron Partners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Morales et al
as 2:2020cv00760
Defendant:
Elizabeth L. Flint, Shawnee Ellis, Roshawna Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy J. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Heath, et al
as 20-4103
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL HEATH, an individual and DAWN HEATH, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HARRY S. JOHNSON, an individual
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. OLP.com Inc
as 2:2020cv00643
Defendant:
Olp.Com Inc
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Petitioner:
John C. Heath
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 5531
Johnson v. Heath, et al
as 20-4095
Defendant / Appellee:
DAWN HEATH, individuals, MICHAEL R. HEATH and MICHAEL HEATH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY S. JOHNSON, an individual
United States v. Heath
as 20-6142
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILIP JAMES HEATH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
