Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Heath v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2013cv00858
Petitioner:
Shy Lamont Heath
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mueller et al v. Heath et al
as 3:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Mark C. Mueller and Thomas W. Mueller
Defendant:
Christipher A. Heath and Frederick J. Maurice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Reid Heath LTD v. Modern Marketing Concepts, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00198
Plaintiff:
Reid Heath LTD
Defendant:
Modern Marketing Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Heath v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00610
Plaintiff:
Jeremy W Heath
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Commonwealth of KY - County of Butler et al
as 1:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of KY - County of Butler, Butler County Sheriff's Department and Heath West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lancaster et al v. Daymar Colleges Group, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lancaster , Charles Larison , Emmanuel Quarles and others
Defendant:
Daymar Colleges Group, LLC , Daymar Learning of Paducah, Inc , Daymar Learning of Ohio, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maddox v. Owensboro Police Department et al
as 4:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
Rocky Ray Maddox
Defendant:
Owensboro Police Department, Department of Transportation, Fred Coomes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
