Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Prescott (PS) v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Myron Pruitt, Homero Garza, Jeffrn Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. T.D.C.J Corr. Officers et al
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Daniel Choate, T.D.C.J Corr. Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 - Americans With Disabilities Act -- Civil Enforcement Actions
Vincent (PS) v. Armstrong
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Vincent
Defendant:
Jennifer Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent (PS) v. Zakrzewski
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Vincent
Defendant:
Kayla Zakrzewski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Konecny (PS) v. Tripper, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02753
Plaintiff:
Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
Tripper, Inc., Origine California, Inc., Ashley Tully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crittendon-Morman v. Lara et al
as 1:2023cv02630
Plaintiff:
Michael Crittendon-Morman
Defendant:
Anthony Lara and Jeffery Schuelke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2023cv02483
Petitioner:
Jeffery David King
Respondent:
Moses Andre Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EIS Ultimate Holding, LP et al v. Huset et al
as 1:2023cv02324
Plaintiff:
EIS Ultimate Holding, LP, EIS Operating Enterprises, LLC and Earth Services & Abatement. LLC
Defendant:
Scott Huset, Impact Industrial Services, Jeffery Wright and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag - Fed. Question - Employment Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
