Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Wells v. Brown et al
as 6:2024cv00106
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Joseph E. Brown and Federal Post Office
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greenwood v. Smith et al
as 9:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
Scott Greenwood
Defendant:
Jeffery T. Smith, Barbuti, Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Badger et al v. City of Cortland
as 5:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
James M. Badger, Marcus A. Benjamin, Sean P. Byrnes and others
Defendant:
City of Cortland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Barnes v. Tatro et al
as 9:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
John G. Tatro, Trevor N. Dunning, Darren E. Basford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett et al v. Blaisure-Ashley
as 3:2022cv00952
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Barrett and Jeffery Barrett
Defendant:
Kristy Blaisure-Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barrett et al v. Benedict
as 3:2022cv00951
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Barrett and Jeffery Barrett
Defendant:
Everett Benedict
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barrett et al v. Grubham et al
as 3:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Barrett and Kimberly Barrett
Defendant:
Lew Grubham and Chad Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Clark et al
as 9:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Leon Graham
Defendant:
Eric Clark, Jacob Proctor, Connor Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery v. Uhler
as 9:2022cv00572
Petitioner:
Eric Jeffery
Respondent:
D. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
