Cases 81 - 90 of 184
Jenkins v. Landrum et al
as 2:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Lewis Jenkins
Defendant:
Billy J. Landrum, Emma Bartee, Ortisa Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. McCarty et al
as 1:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Jenkins
Defendant:
Ron King and Marshall L. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. McCarty et al
as 3:2014cv00969
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Jenkins
Defendant:
Richard McCarty and Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grindle v. Jenkins
as 2:2014cv00197
Plaintiff:
Brandon Grindle
Defendant:
Lepher Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Bayliss Morris Jenkins
Defendant:
Tim Davis, Robert Verzal, Mitchie McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartley et al v. Freese & Goss, et al
as 3:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Hartley , Minnie Copeland , Hazel Thigpen and others
Defendant:
Freese & Goss, PLLC , Richard A. Freese , Dennis C. Sweet, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
True the Vote et al v. Hosemann et al
as 3:2014cv00532
Plaintiff:
True the Vote , Jane Coln , Brandie Correro and others
Defendant:
Delbert Hosemann , The Republican Party of Mississippi , Copiah County, Mississippi Election Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Lee et al
as 4:2014cv00081
Petitioner:
Larry N. Jenkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Earnest Lee and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Juwana R. Jenkins
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jenkins v. Phillips 66 Company et al
as 2:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
Keith Jenkins
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company , Phillips Petroleum Company , Drilling Specialties Company, L.L.C. and others
Cross_claimant:
Montello, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
