Cases 1 - 10 of 55,699
Estate of Daniel Joseph Zellmer et al v. Eastern State Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Estate of Daniel Joseph Zellmer, Jesse Zellmer and Sarah Zellmer
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital, Tony Bowie, Jane Doe Bowie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
TSURT LLC et al v. Various John Does et al
as 2:2024cv03635
Plaintiff:
TSURT, LLC and Pearl Jam, LLC
Defendant:
John Does, ABC Companies and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Soto v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc., et al.
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
John Soto
Defendant:
Graybar Electric Company, Inc. and Ernesto Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Halgat v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2771
Plaintiff:
JEREMY JOHN HALGAT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CITY OF LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Soto v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2024at00357
Plaintiff:
John Soto
Defendant:
Graybar Electric Company, Inc. and Ernesto Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Doe v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv03601
Plaintiff:
John JB Doe
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Matze v. PARLER LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
John Matze
Defendant:
PARLER LLC, NDMAscendant, LLC, Jeffrey Wernick and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
