Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ochoa v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ochoa
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ochoa v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ochoa
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ochoa v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04477
Plaintiff:
Rosalia Ochoa
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ochoa v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01322
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
NORMA OCHOA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morales et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02544
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Johnny P. Morales and Marisela Ochoa Arriada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres-Ochoa v. Serrott et al
as 2:2018cv00965
Defendant:
Mark A. Serrott, Jay G. Perez and David W. Inshey
Plaintiff:
Loreto Torres-Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ochoa v. Bard et al
as 2:2018cv00892
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ochoa et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20051
Plaintiff:
Regina E. Ochoa and Jerome Ochoa
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirk Matthew Schultz v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, et al
as 1:2011cv01046
Defendant:
Jon Namle, Karen Netherton, Julissa Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Matthew Schultz doing business as Whipstocking Idea Co. doing business as No Mow Yard Inc. doing business as Clothes Line Fashions LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
