Cases 1 - 10 of 1,644
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cardenas v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Demecio Cardenas
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Warren Roberts, Dr. Leland Beamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson v. Gullick et al
as 2:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Reginald Marcel Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gullick, Dr. Michael Adcox and Dr. Warren Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moore v. Irish et al
as 1:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Daren J. Moore
Defendant:
Patrick Irish, Thomas Andreazzi, Robert Fenner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Erskine v. US. Government Agencies
as 6:2024cv00778
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Erskine
Respondent:
US. Government Agencies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
