Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,683
Kirsh v. BP Products North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01523
Plaintiff: Michael B Kirsh
Defendant: BP Products North America, Inc., Robert Grosman and Robert Gosman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kreikemeir v. Berger et al
as 4:2024cv02336
Plaintiff: Dillon Kreikemeir
Defendant: William J. Berger, Rahman D'Argenio, Michael C. Morgan and others
Bryan v. Arriaga et al
as 4:2024cv02344
Plaintiff: Robert Bryan
Defendant: Roberta Arriaga and CBRE Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ROBERTS v. TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00463
Plaintiff: EVELYN ROBERTS
Defendant: TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY and JAMES R. INGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James v. Bowie County Correctional Center Annex
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Robert James
Defendant: Bowie County Correctional Center Annex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whelan v. Berger et al
as 4:2024cv02317
Plaintiff: John Whelan
Defendant: William J. Berger, Rahman D'Argenio, Michael C. Morgan and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
v. Finance of America Reverse LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00045
Not Yet Classified: Robert M Moorehead, Jr
Defendant: Finance of America Reverse LLC and Compu-Link Corporation doing business as Celink
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00559
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ayers v. Sunnova Energy International, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02294
Plaintiff: Patrick Ayers
Defendant: William J Berger, Robert L Lane, Anne Slaughter Andrew and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?