Cases 1 - 10 of 1,092
Shaw v. Commerce Bank
as 2:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Shaw
Defendant:
Commerce Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Waters v. Naylor
as 5:2024cv03049
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Waters
Defendant:
Robert D. Naylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hill
Defendant:
Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morris v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 5:2024cv04020
Plaintiff:
Robert James Morris
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alford (ID 57845) v. Harrod et al
as 5:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Brent L. Alford
Defendant:
Gordon Harrod, Robert Wray and Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Groshong (ID 127459) v. Henke et al
as 5:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Groshong
Defendant:
John-Mark A. Henke and Shara Wark
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 5:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Waters v. Naylor
as 5:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Waters
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and Robert D. Naylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
