Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Pinto, et al v. Garland
as 23-9605
Petitioner:
FRANCIELY DE SOUZA PINTO and NICOLAS SOUZA-RODRIGUES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
GS Holistic, LLC v. Paramathma Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01829
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Paramathma Inc doing business as Royal Pipes and Hookahs and Anil Rodrigues
Interested Party:
Robert Taylor and Arshia Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Rodrigues v. American Family Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
Nicole Rodrigues
Defendant:
American Family Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Castillo et al v. Rendon et al
as 1:2021cv01163
Plaintiff:
Tomas Castillo and Stacy Castillo
Counter Claimant:
Janet Rendon and Jesus Alejandro Rodrigues
Defendant:
Estate of Samuel Castillo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franchek v. Park City Municipal Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00563
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Franchek
Defendant:
Park City Municipal Corporation, James Rodrigues, Cameron Thor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00618
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00539
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rivera Rodrigues v. French et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Defendant:
Centurion Correctional Health Care of NM, LLC, FNU French and CTR Correction System
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rivera Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
