Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Green v. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Green
Defendant:
The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, The State of California, Warden Steve Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. Pollard et al
as 3:2020cv02419
Defendant:
Soriano, ., John Doe, Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lawrence Latham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Casey v. Truillo et al
as 2:2020cv00763
Defendant:
A. Garcia, S. Falon, Vera and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Casey v. Truillo et al
as 1:2020cv00560
Defendant:
A. Garcia, S. Falon, Vera and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shau-Ron Sykes v. The Los Angeles County Sheriff Department Employees et al
as 2:2018cv07080
Defendant:
Deputy Buenios Barrio, Deputy Rodrigues, Deputies Dale Galipo and others
Plaintiff:
Shau-Ron Sykes and Shau-Ron Walter Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bowersock v. Kernan et al
as 1:2018cv01040
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Bowersock
Defendant:
M. Rodrigues, A Williams, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowersock v. Kernan et al
as 3:2018cv01484
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Bowersock
Defendant:
M. Rodrigues, A Williams, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Bowersock v. Kernan et al
as 1:2018cv03057
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Bowersock
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, Stuart Sherman, A. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Ohta et al
as 4:2016cv06805
Plaintiff:
Kavin Maurice Rhodes
Defendant:
Sam Ohta, Peter Swarth, Antonio Bestard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. Rodrigues et al
as 1:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
Mark Schmidt
Defendant:
- Rodrigues, Eddie Villanueba, Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
