Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Alonso v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 8:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
Abelardo Alonso , Arieala Sollett , Gaspar Colon and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alonso v. Benvenuto et al
as 0:2016cv62603
Plaintiff:
Grisel Alonso
Defendant:
James Benvenuto, NGU Investors, LLC, Jean Benvenuto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SANTOS v. THE CARRINGTON COMPANIES, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv03679
Plaintiff:
PEDRO SANTOS
Defendant:
THE CARRINGTON COMPANIES, LLC, CARRINGTON HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evalobo et al v. Pite Duncan, LLP et al
as 2:2016cv00539
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Santos Cortez and Richard Evalobo
Defendant:
Rebecca P. Kern, Pite Duncan, LLP, U.S. Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Santo v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv10599
Plaintiff:
Paul Santo
Defendant:
United States of America, Burac Obama, Jeh Johnson and others
United States of America v. Luna-Santos
as 3:2015cv03008
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmencita Luna-Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Caro Bonet et al v. Lotus Management LLC et al
as 3:2015cv02106
Plaintiff:
Armando Caro Bonet and Iris Santos Diaz
Defendant:
Lotus Management LLC, Jorge E. Perez, Livepad International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Olaf Bonales v. Espirito Santo Bank
as 15-11446
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OLAF BONALES
Defendant - Appellant:
ESPIRITO SANTO BANK
SANTOS v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC. et al
as 2:2015cv00864
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, AMERICAN MODERN INSURANCE GROUP, AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
SANTOS and PEDRO SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonales v. Espirito Santo Bank
as 1:2014cv24132
Defendant:
Espirito Santo Bank
Plaintiff:
Olaf Bonales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
