Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Pecora v. Kimberly
as 1:2023cv01632
Petitioner:
Jesse Santo Pecora
Respondent:
M Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCurdy v. Bender et al
as 7:2012cv03001
Plaintiff:
Santos Nazzarra McCurdy
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Roxanna Bender, James Reddoch and Catherine Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)(CONSENT)
as 2:2012cv00718
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze and K. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Lawson, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00621
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
Nathaniel Lawson, Gwendolyn Babers, S. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Gould et al (INMATE 2)(CONSENT)
as 2:2011cv01033
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
Danny Gould , Hugh Hood and Tahir Siddiq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Mitchem et al
as 7:2011cv02666
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Patric and Robinson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, W. Myers, Jeffery Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Jefferson Davis Tech. College et al
as 1:2010cv00505
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Jefferson Davis Tech. College, Mr. Thame and Robin Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2010cv02057
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy Patrick and Patrick Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. State of Alabama, The
as 2:2010cv01214
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
