Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Gomez #154269 v. De La Santos et al
as 2:2018cv03294
Defendant:
Unknown Gomez, Unknown Williams, Unknown Coffman and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. MCA Financial Group Limited
as 2:2018mc00042
Plaintiff:
William Shelton, Aaron Dunning, James Stephens and others
Defendant:
MCA Financial Group Limited
Respondent:
MidCap Financial Trust and MidCap Funding X Trust
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Silvas #048381 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00483
Petitioner:
Raul Santos Silvas
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez #241374 v. De La Santos et al
as 2:2017cv01138
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bruce Martinez
Defendant:
Unknown De La Santos, Unknown Roan, ML Oshita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. De Los Santos et al
as 2:2017cv00474
Plaintiff:
Aminadab Soto
Defendant:
Eddy De Los Santos, Unknown Belmonte, Unknown Tamcredy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santos Varela v. Norman
as 2:2016cv04562
Petitioner:
Diana Virginia Santos Varela
Respondent:
Christopher Raymond Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
3 Ratones Ciegos v. Mucha Lucha Libre Taco Shop 1 LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04538
Plaintiff:
3 Ratones Ciegos
Defendant:
Mucha Lucha Libre Taco Shop 1 LLC , Mucha Lucha Libre Taco Shop 3 LLC , Santos Lucha Libre Taco Shop 2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Santos-Nunez v. USA
as 2:2016cv01851
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mario Enrique Santos-Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01530
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
