Cases 31 - 40 of 1,332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cardoso v. Chang Li Supermarket Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Santos Cardoso
Defendant:
Chang Li Supermarket Inc and Cathy Jiang
Santos v. Lidl US, LLC
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Sandra Santos
Defendant:
Lidl US, LLC doing business as Lidl
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06051
Plaintiff:
Joshua Santos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Santos v. Schroeder
as 24-198
Defendant / Appellee:
Corrections Officer C. KASSEN, Sgt. J. SIRVENT, Lt. G. MASNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCISCO SANTOS
Defendant:
C. J. ROGOFSKY, Lt.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Perez v. Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn et al
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
David Perez and Alex De Los Santos Sanchez
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
