Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Bloodsaw et al v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv10366
Plaintiff:
Audrey Bloodsaw and Steven Simpson
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turley v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10054
Plaintiff:
Simpson G Turley
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc. and DraftKings Holdings, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Precht v. RealPage, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv12230
Plaintiff:
David Precht
Defendant:
RealPage, Inc., Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Cushman & Wakefield Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
White v. RealPage, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv12134
Plaintiff:
Billie Jo White
Defendant:
RealPage, Inc., Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2022cv11746
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Madhuri Trivedi
Defendant:
General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Larry Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simpson v. UKG Inc et al
as 1:2022cv10947
Plaintiff:
Casey Simpson
Defendant:
UKG Inc and Kronos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brunnett v. Simpson Strong-Tie et al
as 1:2022cv10086
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brunnett
Defendant:
Simpson Strong-Tie, Ryan Kaelin and Aniket Borwankar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bourne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2020cv10898
Defendant:
Dorothy Simpson, Town of East Bridgewater and Roy E. Gardner
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bourne
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
