Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Turnbow Avery v. Postmaster General
as 1:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Ray Turnbow Avery
Defendant:
Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Avery v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00959
Plaintiff:
Kristin Avery
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Avery v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04278
Plaintiff:
James Owen Avery
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02282
Plaintiff:
Avery B. Smith and Rosalind Curry
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Flowers v. Barcus et al
as 2:2022cv02196
Plaintiff:
Lamuel S. Flowers
Defendant:
Lisa Barcus, Sgt. Bob Avery, C.O. Everhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery et al v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Stacy Avery and Shelley Avery
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
