Cases 11 - 20 of 28
London v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2018cv01028
Defendant:
Jennifer Koehler, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Sara Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00889
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections , State of Wisconsin Probation and Parole Commission, Jim Schwochert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynn v. Anderson et al
as 2:2017cv01144
Plaintiff:
Charles Ruben Wynn
Defendant:
Theodore I Anderson , Timothy C Houg, Matthew A Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sierra-Lopez, David et al v. Blair et al
as 3:2017cv00646
Plaintiff:
David E. Sierra-Lopez
Defendant:
Blair , Chattman, Parento and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blitz, Thomas et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv00473
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blitz , Kevin Blair , Gregory Chick and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company and Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marks, Daniel v. Union Bank Of Blair et al
as 3:2017cv00367
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Marks
Defendant:
Union Bank Of Blair, Carl Axness, Dennis Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blair v. Schlitz et al
as 2:2016cv01563
Plaintiff:
DeAndre L Blair
Defendant:
Brad Schlitz, Aaron Lamberty, Michael J Piontek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00790
Petitioner:
Gary D Blair
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 2:2016mc00015
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Dan Williams , Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
London v. DiMotto et al
as 2:2015cv00429
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Defendant:
Jean DiMotto, David A Clarke , Edward Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
