Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Davidson v. Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 4:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant:
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
David Eldridge
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli, Unknown Mims, Unknown McNear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Hettenbach et al
as 4:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Houston
Defendant:
Bryan L. Hettenbach, Jenniffer E. Matthew, Annette Llewellyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koenig v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01524
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Koenig, Jr.
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Centurion, Bryan Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Hacker et al
as 2:2023cv04141
Petitioner:
Dean Davidson and Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent:
Denise Hacker and Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cottle v. State of Missouri
as 4:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cottle, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Woods v. Loflin et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Billy Loflin, Unknown Womack, Unknown Flint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis-Bey v. Brewer et al
as 4:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Jada Davis-Bey
Defendant:
Cole Brewer, Officer Lebert, Rochelle Monea Wooliest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. USA
as 4:2023cv00470
Petitioner:
Bryan Kimble
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davidson v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv00324
Petitioner:
Dean Davidson and Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent:
Denise Hacker and Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
