Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Giles et al v. Stay Dry Waterproofing, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
David Giles, Morgan Brey, Matt Dotson and others
Defendant:
Stay Dry Waterproofing, LLC and MARK MINTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Dearing v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Michael Dearing, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimmy Rogers, Logan Collins, Shawn Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cooley et al v. Frazier et al
as 1:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Regina Cooley and Reginald Bennett
Defendant:
Ryan Frazier, United States Postal Service, U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Cooley v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04273
Plaintiff:
Virginia Cooley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cooley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03334
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cooley v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02394
Plaintiff:
Laura A Cooley
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
