Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Culver v. Saint Francis Health System, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Tierney Culver, Katelyn Arroyo, Nathan Bates and others
Defendant:
Saint Francis Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Goodwin v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00773
Petitioner:
Eullis Monroe Goodwin
Respondent:
Kris Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
David v. Crow et al
as 5:2021cv00534
Defendant:
Paul Haines, T Lauer, FNU Glover and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin & Goodwin, Inc. v. Neel, Harvell and Associates, PC et al
as 6:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Goodwin & Goodwin, Inc.
Defendant:
Neel, Harvell and Associates, PC and Aero-Mod, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Goodwin v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv00592
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Janet M Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Yates et al
as 6:2020cv00124
Defendant:
J.C. Colbert, Mark Knutson, Anastacio Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Delores Ann Springer, John Charles Tiger, Nancie Lou Longacres Warrior and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01338
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Goodwin v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2017cv00670
Plaintiff:
Gary Lynn Goodwin, Jr
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Lori A Goodwin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
