Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Goodwin et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Ronald Goodwin, Scott, Amanda Goodwin and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Castleman-Goodwin et al v. Lindsay et al
as 3:2020cv01071
Plaintiff:
Mary Castleman-Goodwin and Rene Cerda
Defendant:
Alan E. Lindsay and Penske Truck Leasing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bennett v. Watwood et al
as 3:2019cv00567
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Tony Mays, Tony Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Carman et al
as 3:2018cv00972
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., f/n/u Roach, Carroll Carman and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Hall et al
as 3:2016cv01347
Plaintiff:
Turner A. Goodwin
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Chris Brown, Pamela Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2015cv00927
Plaintiff:
Turner Alexander Goodwin
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Hill Detention Center, Samantha Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Morphis v. City of Dickson, Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00989
Plaintiff:
Emmett Joshua Morphis
Defendant:
City of Dickson, Tennessee, Seth Goodwin, Rob Peeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodwin v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00920
Plaintiff:
Mealie W. Goodwin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harrison v. City of Dickson, Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv01044
Plaintiff:
Paul David Harrison
Defendant:
City of Dickson, Tennessee and Seth Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
