Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BEATTY v. HENSHAW et al
as 1:2019cv00622
Defendant:
INMATE UTAH DOCKERY #143189, HENSHAW and HOOLEY
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR BEATTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01320
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
BURGESS DOE, HENSHAW DOE, WENDY KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWE v. LAGENOUR et al
as 1:2017cv02882
Defendant:
LAURA BODKINS, ROY BUCKNER, CAMAY FRANCUM and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
LARRY ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEABROOKS v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2013cv00600
Defendant:
Facility Program Dir ANDY BEGUHN, Warden KEITH BUTTS, ASR J FRENCH and others
Plaintiff:
KEREL L SEABROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFERS v. HANKS et al
as 1:2012cv00049
Defendant:
JOHN FLOWERS, S GARD, CRAIG HANKS and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY R. JEFFERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffers v. Hanks et al
as 3:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
Leroy R Jeffers
Defendant:
Craig Hanks, John Flowers, S Gard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHEUMANN-WHITNEY v. STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2010cv00630
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., GOVERNOR MITCH DANIELS, ALL EMPLOYEES and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHARLES SCHEUMANN-WHITNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFERS v. HANKS et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Defendant:
JOHN FLOWERS, S GARD, CRAIG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffers v. Hanks et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Leroy R Jeffers
Defendant:
Craig Hanks, John Flowers, S Gard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES et al v. BUSS et al
as 1:2009cv01322
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES, LAWRENCE BETHEA, COREY HABEGGER and others
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS, KELLEY KURTZ, D. HENSHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
