Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Voggenthaler, et al., v. Maryland Square, LLC, et al.,
as 2:2008cv01618
Plaintiff:
William Montero, Barbara Montero, Clifford Rogers and others
Counter Defendant:
Maryland Square, LLC and Melvin Shapiro
Defendant:
Maryland Square Shopping Center, LLC, Herman Kishner doing business as Maryland Square Shopping Center, Irwin Kishner and others
Cross Defendant:
Jerry Engel, Delia's Cleaners of Arizona, Inc., CB Richard Ellis and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Pacific Employers Insurance Company, Bowe Permac, Inc., Dr. Clean Management, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Terrible Herbst Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
England v. Hoyt et al
as 3:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Walter England
Defendant:
Christian Hoyt, Reno Police Department and City of Reno
Interested Party:
Jacob S. Peck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amazon.com INC et al v. WDC Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2021ms00171
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com INC and Amazon Data Services, INC.
Defendant:
WDC Holdings LLC doing business as Northstar Commercial Partners, Brian Watson, Sterling NCP FF, LLC and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
800 Hoyt LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
WDC Holdings, LLC, PLW Capital I, LLC, BW Holdings and others
Vohra Wound Physicians Management, LLC v. Gordian Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01825
Plaintiff:
Vohra Wound Physicians Management, LLC
Defendant:
Gordian Medical, Inc. and Suzette Hoyt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States v. Hoyt et al
as 2:2010cv00535
Defendant:
Phillip E. Hoyt and PKR Industries
Plaintiff:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
