Cases 31 - 40 of 232
Hughes v. USA
as 1:2020cv00292
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas Lebron Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hughes v. Myers
as 3:2020cv00765
Petitioner:
Willie Hughes, Jr.
Respondent:
Kevin Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hughes v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00244
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hughes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG3)
as 2:2020cv00109
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
James E. Hughes
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Covington v. Hamblen County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00104
Defendant:
Escobar Jarnigan, Chad Hughs, Teresa Laws and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Perry Nelson Covington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00364
Defendant:
Hugh M. Queener, Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Davidson County, Tennessee, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Hughes v. Gupta et al
as 2:2020cv02200
Plaintiff:
Dr. Thomas A. Hughes
Defendant:
Malini Gupta, G2Endo and Consolidated Medical Practices of Memphis, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Niceley v. Parris
as 3:2020cv00088
Petitioner:
Hugh A. Niceley
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamby v. Ammerman et al
as 3:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Melissa Jo McComb and Hugh T. Ammerman
Plaintiff:
William D. Hamby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
