Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Krause et al
as 4:2021mc09183
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Charles A Whobrey
Defendant:
Beth A Krause and John Doe
Gaertner v. Sowell et al
as 4:2020cv01872
Defendant:
Sharron Williams, 2nd, Madison Hudson, Chase Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Gaertner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konys et al v. Krause - Werk GmbH & Co. KG et al
as 4:2019cv03262
Plaintiff:
Julia Konys and John Konys
Defendant:
Krause - Werk GmbH & Co. KG and Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alcanter et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv02902
Plaintiff:
DAMON GIALOURIS, UDO HARTTUNG, LONNIE CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Krause v. GC Services, LP
as 4:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
Karrie Krause
Defendant:
GC Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Simmons et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
Michele Simmons , Mary Schlenk , Carol Stockton and others
Defendant:
Skechers USA, Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krause v. Rogers
as 2:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
Daniel Krause
Defendant:
Pamela Jo Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krause v. Rogers
as 4:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
Daniel Krause
Defendant:
Pamela Jo Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler et al v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01485
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Butler , D.A. , Austin Bartley and others
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
