Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jensen v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2023cv01783
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jensen
Defendant:
Cody Lane and City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Williams v. Denmar LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01431
Defendant:
Black Elk LLC, Regional Transportation District, FCPT Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KW Lane LTD and Davon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00904
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 a
Dimick v. Allstate Corporation, The
as 1:2019cv01240
Defendant:
Julie Anderson, Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, Simon Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Dimick, Drake William Dimick, Laura Kristine Dimick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chestnut v. Lane et al
as 1:2018cv02699
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Kathy P. Lane
Petitioner:
Hermie Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santistevan v. Lane et al
as 1:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Santistevan
Defendant:
Lane, Munson, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
French et al v. City of Cortez et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
Patti French , Glenn French and Shane French
Defendant:
City of Cortez , Casey Eubanks , Jennifer Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handy v. Vigil et al
as 1:2013cv01963
Plaintiff:
Wyatt T. Handy, Jr.
Defendant:
Vigil, (I) Vigil, Ippel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Callies et al v. Lane et al
as 1:2013cv00484
Plaintiff:
Lori Callies and Kevin Callies
Defendant:
Lisa Lane, Sally (I) Chapman, Erin Jemison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
