Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Martin v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
Brittany Valencia Martin
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus, Melinda Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Henze et al
as 1:2024cv02752
Plaintiff:
Omarrian Jones and I.M.
Defendant:
Henze, Velapinto, Steven Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loftus v. USA
as 3:2024cv00653
Petitioner:
William B. Loftus, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CHATMAN et al v. LOCKE et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
DAJUNT CHATMAN, DAJUNT PORTER, LASHAN BRYANT and others
Defendant:
DETECTIVE NORMAN LOCKE, OFFICER KIRK KOTCHIG, DAVID REICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Steven Murphy
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galvez v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Jorge I Galvez
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, . George, . Hamby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Campbell et al
as 3:2023cv03203
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dickerson
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, B Loftus, Dan Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ausmus v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03182
Plaintiff:
Richard Ausmus
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes, Tionna Farrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyce v. Loftus et al
as 3:2023cv03175
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boyce
Defendant:
Jon Loftus, Rob Jeffreys, . Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fonville v. Campbell et al
as 3:2023cv03105
Plaintiff:
Michael Fonville
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, Bill Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
