Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mcneely v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02663
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cary Mcneely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McNeely v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv01937
Plaintiff:
Rachel McNeely
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McNeely v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv04418
Plaintiff:
Ammond McNeely
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNeely v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020oe00674
Plaintiff:
Ammond McNeely
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNeely v. State of Ohio
as 3:2018cv02528
Plaintiff:
Robert H. McNeely
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeely v. Havlin et al
as 3:2016cv00568
Plaintiff:
Robert McNeely, III
Defendant:
Jim Havlin, John Perez, Thomas Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeely v. Sheldon et al
as 3:2014cv01318
Plaintiff:
Robert McNeely
Defendant:
Edward Sheldon, Corey Foster, Jane Godsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeely v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22617
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise McNeely
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teeter et al v. City of Painesville et al
as 1:2011cv00795
Plaintiff:
Arnold Teeter, Samantha Pritchard, Mitchell Teeter and others
Defendant:
City of Painesville , B McNeely , M Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeely et al v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17400
Plaintiff:
Charles E. McNeely and Virginia McNeely
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
