Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Molly Moon's Homemade Ice Cream LLC v. City of Seattle
as 2:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
Molly Moon's Homemade Ice Cream LLC
Defendant:
City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avery et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
Devon Avery, Blondel Garner, Brian Hayes and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moon v. Saul
as 1:2021cv03063
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Minerva Eveline Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Moon v. Saul
as 4:2020cv05057
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Dena R Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moon v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00266
Plaintiff:
Melinda M Moon
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bond et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Pacific Coffee Inc, Cameron's Coffee and Distribution Company, MNS LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Morris and Michael Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corker et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00290
Plaintiff:
Melanie Bondera, Colehour Bondera, Robert Smith and others
Defendant:
Cameron's Coffee and Distribution Company, Gold Coffee Roasters, Inc., Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Buchalter PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Moon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00221
Plaintiff:
Darrel W. Moon and Darrel W Moon
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Moon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2018cv05164
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Dena Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Moon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv03149
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Minerva Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
