Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Newberry v. Wolf et al
as 3:2018cv01317
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Newberry
Defendant:
County of Barbersville, W. VA., Department of Corrections for W. VA., State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newberry v. Wole et al
as 3:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Newberry
Defendant:
County of Barbersville, W. VA., Department of Corrections for W. VA., State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newberry v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18892
Plaintiff:
Tania Newberry
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heaster et al v. EQT Production Company et al
as 1:2014cv00030
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Heaster , Patsy J. Heaster , Michael P. Heaster and others
Defendant:
EQT Production Company , Appalachian Royalties, Inc., Sarah Lynn Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newberry v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv29071
Plaintiff:
Donna E. Newberry
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newberry et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv14518
Plaintiff:
Katherine Newberry and Brent Newberry
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newberry v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv13399
Plaintiff:
Patricia Newberry
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newberry v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00837
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Newberry
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newberry v. Boston Scientific Corporation, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04182
Plaintiff:
Jimmye Janice Newberry
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Inc., Proxy Biomedical, Inc. and Proxy Biomedical, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
