Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Mason v. Twin Falls County Sheriff
as 3:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
Norman Jacob Mason
Defendant:
Twin Falls County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Werenka v. City of Boise, et al.
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ty Werenka and Ty Justin William Werenka
Defendant:
City of Boise, Norman Carter, Avery Westendorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horsley v. Wardwell
as 1:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Norman Horsley
Defendant:
William Wardwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Matthews v. Craven et al
as 1:2020cv00037
Plaintiff:
Terrence James Matthews
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Norman Langelak, Cris Colson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomperts et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv00345
Defendant:
M.D. Janet Woodcock, Thomas Christl, US Food and Drug Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Rebecca Gomperts and Aidaccess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The Cincinnati Insurance Company et al v. Reflok, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00451
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company and The Cincinnati Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Reflok, Inc., Direct Expansion Solutions, Inc., DMG Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheveck v. City of Boise et al
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Scheveck
Defendant:
City of Boise, David G Frederick, David S Kaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00352
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
