Cases 31 - 40 of 1,577
Hall v. Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Demarko Hall
Defendant:
Ronald Oliver, McCoy, Gabriela Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Oliver, et al.
as 24-474
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS SHARIF MCNEAL
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD OLIVER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Gomez, Jr. v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Oscar Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Nevada and Ronald Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Monterey County Superior Court et al
as 4:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Monterey County Superior Court, Judge Lydia M. Villarreal, Judge Timothy P. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Matthew Combs
Defendant:
Oliver, Sr. C/O Tate, Tanya Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. EHM Productions Inc., et al.
as 24-324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
EHM PRODUCTIONS INC., AABACO SMALL BUSINESS, LLC, DOTDASH MEDIA, INC. and others
Ronk v. Hudson, et al.
as 24-145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE RONK
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERYN ELIZABETH HUDSON, p/k/a Katy Perry, BRITTANY HAZZARD, p/k/a Starrah, FERRAS ALQAISI and others
Mateo-Diego, et al. v. Garland
as 24-139
Petitioner:
ELVIRA MATEO-DIEGO, CATARINA ABIGAIL MATEO DIEGO and ANTONIO OLIVER VERGANZA MATEO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Kelly v. Western Transport, LLC et al
as 9:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
James Michael Kelly
Defendant:
Western Transport, LLC and John Edward Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
